"Well, yes, supervillains do change the rules a little bit." But her mind pokes holes in that logic too--Bruce Wayne could use his extreme wealth and technology to come up with more efficient solutions, and Arkham clearly is a mess that isn't going to reform anyone.
Then again, she might have to change up her own rulebook. She still believes systems are better than anarchy, but what happens when you can't trust the systems? What happens when the organizations you're supposed to trust do things like, say, clone journalists and keep them locked up without access to internet? She could certainly use a hero busting in through the CDC and rescuing her from the mad scientists, and what really is the difference between Shaun and Batman, besides Shaun's lack of a costume and complete willingness to kill?
"I can see why Batman would be needed in some situations. Maybe even a lot of situations. But things like that should be the exception, not the rule. And it certainly shouldn't be a permanent solution. What happens when he dies? Do you take over?"
no subject
Then again, she might have to change up her own rulebook. She still believes systems are better than anarchy, but what happens when you can't trust the systems? What happens when the organizations you're supposed to trust do things like, say, clone journalists and keep them locked up without access to internet? She could certainly use a hero busting in through the CDC and rescuing her from the mad scientists, and what really is the difference between Shaun and Batman, besides Shaun's lack of a costume and complete willingness to kill?
"I can see why Batman would be needed in some situations. Maybe even a lot of situations. But things like that should be the exception, not the rule. And it certainly shouldn't be a permanent solution. What happens when he dies? Do you take over?"