nascensibility: we coULD HAVE HAD IT ALL (wait what)
𝐸𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑦𝑛 𝑂'πΆπ‘œπ‘›π‘›π‘’π‘™π‘™ ([personal profile] nascensibility) wrote in [community profile] entrancelogs 2015-03-29 04:24 pm (UTC)

[He's dodging the subject rather admirably, a roundabout use of double-edged words. Hannibal is skilled in subtext and encouraging dialogue, fluent in wresting information from the most reticent of characters - here, however, he has the supreme advantage of knowing her intimately.

It feels akin to treading on a floor of eggshells over an active volcano, even in disagreeing with the assessment that Will has a disorder. It suggests confusion, the interruption of a perfect arrangement, and a state of disruption she has never seen in him before.
]

And what "disorder" is that?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting